Editorial
20 October 2006


Anger, death, and blind incompetence


By John T. Smith, Editor in Chief
World Fathers Union News Page



I'm angry.

I don't let that show often. It's counter-productive, as our version of what Orwell called 'correct-speak' would have it. It makes one lose perspective and control, and it makes others turn a deaf ear to one's most heartfelt rantings. No one likes to hear another rant. Not even one's friends, and certainly not those he would make into partisans of his cause....

But it's been a very bad couple of weeks in the news, and two recent stories of preventable infanticides in Canada reflect only a part of that.

In Toronto, Ontario, two little girls were apparently murdered by their mother as her solution to a losing custody battle she'd been waging with the father. The Children's Aid Society of Simcoe, the responsible government organisation, now stands accused of having botched the affair. Yet within a week, certain apologists were already squawking about the unfairness of calls to fire the incompetent fools responsible. There will be no justice for those two girls; the best their father or grandparents can hope for is a typical, lengthy government report which won't be issued for years, and certainly won't fix anything.

In the same week, another report out of Newfoundland condemned that province's child welfare and custody system for its behaviour in a case back in 2003. Having granted custody to a mother with a long history of mental illness, the Newfoundland C.W. system also ignored the fact the mother was charged with murdering her husband in the United States. Incredibly, she was allowed to keep custody while she was out on bail awaiting extradition to the U.S. on the murder charge. And she still had custody when she walked into the icy ocean waters near Conception Bay, Newfoundland, carrying her 13-month-old son, Zachary, killing both the child and herself.

These are only two of the reasons I am angry, but either one of them is more than sufficient, it seems to me. Any man who was not angered by the official incompetence, stupidity, and self-satisfied we-know-best attitude of either of these so-called children's aid societies would have to be insane.

For close to six months, my colleague John F. has been putting stories from the world press into a data-base on domestic violence and infanticide. They are as numerous as they are horrifying--the list below is only a very small sampling:

  • The 'Baby Norton' murder in South Africa wherein the father's former girlfriend hired four hitmen to kill the child;
  • The Andrea Yates case in Texas in the United States, wherein the 42-year-old Yates drowned her five children one after another in the bathtub;
  • The Robin Kraft case in Ohio, wherein she sexually abused one of her children and forced the others have sex with each other;
  • The young mother in Washington, who sneaked her newborn baby out of the hospital to prevent doctors from performing life-saving surgery upon it;
  • The pregnant welfare mother in Illinois who left three of her ten children in her SUV and then ignored it as it burned right outside the store where she was shopping (the ten-month-old baby burned to death while her mother spent her welfare check in K-Mart);
  • And possibly most horrific of all: the Chytoria Graham case in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, wherein Graham, pregnant with her fifth child, is reported to have used her 4-week-old baby boy as a weapon to club her boyfriend, fracturing the baby's skull.

  • From one gut-wrenching story to the next, these cases are a soul-shattering depiction of evil run rampant...and of the total failure of child protection departments everywhere. In the Illinois case, the state's DCFS had cited the mother four times in the past on negligence charges, and knew they were living in squallor so fetid that the caseworkers and other family members were made sick just going into the house. And still it left the children in her custody.

    Can you imagine any child welfare department--in any of these cases--acting as they did above if the parent in question had been the father?

    What will it take? What will it take?? And how much will it take??

    How many decades, how many thousands of innocent children neglected, abused, or murdered by their mothers will it take before the government realise that just because a parent is female does not guarantee she will not kill or abuse them?

    In the aftermath of such a brutal week, it was some small and cold comfort to see Timothy Appleby's article, Mothers kill as often as fathers do, in the Globe and Mail (CAN). I must say, however, that it is very small, and very cold comfort indeed. It's not helped me sleep any better this last little while, nor has it stopped me grinding my teeth.

    But possibly your Member of Parliament needs some comfort this week. I suggest you print Mr Appleby's article, along with this editorial, and mail them to him. After all, being angry at him won't do any good, will it? It will just give him a perfect excuse to not listen to you....