| http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/03/24/nice-to-see-fathers-4-justice-uk-and-fathers-4-justice-us-mend-rift/
Nice
to See Fathers 4 Justice U.K. and Fathers
4 Justice U.S. Mend Rift
By
Glenn Sacks
March 25, 2007, Men's News Daily
(USA)---I have on numerous occasions
stated my admiration for the English fatherhood
group Fathers 4 Justice, its tactics, its
activists including F4J sympathizer David
“Spiderman” Chick, and Matt
O’Connor, its controversial founder.
In 2005 there was a split between O’Connor
and the American Fathers 4 Justice, led
by Minnesota activist Jamil Jabr. At the
time I wrote Matt the following letter:
“Dear Matt:
“Jamil may get pissed off at me
for writing this but I have some brief
thoughts I’d like to share with
you.
“Needless to say I am disappointed
over the events of the past week regarding
F4J in England and in the US. I have defended
F4J’s actions countless times in
the media, both on my radio show and on
other shows, as well as in newspapers.
Until now I have always defended your
allegedly ‘dictatorial’ leadership
style, and I still believe that F4J would
not have come to prominence without it.
Given my experience in the US, I believe
I understand why you felt you had to do
things the way you did.
“I assume that the U.K. fathers’
movement three years ago was like the
movement in the US, with many competent
and well-meaning people in it, but in
the end far more getting said than getting
done. To do what you did, at least in
the U.S., would probably require someone
willing to scrap the nice, inclusive,
big tent approach and instead select a
handful of guys who could be made into
a disciplined force by ‘dictatorial’
means.
“As I’ve seen, unfortunately
sometimes rhetoric about open discussions,
debates and democratic organization as
simply code words for ‘talk and
do nothing’ or ‘attack those
who actually do something because it didn’t
include us.’ I’ve always admired
you for having the guts to do things the
way you knew they had to be done.
“However, while Matt O’Connor
is a hero that does not make him a saint,
nor does it mean he’s always right.
Out of ignorance I will refrain from discussing
the details of the UK split. However,
in the US I find it hard to believe that
Jamil has acted inappropriately or has
not done what was in the movement’s
best interests. Unless I’m really
dumb, Jamil is a sincere and committed
activist trying to do a very difficult
job. Matt, I know that you have worked
under tremendous pressure for the past
several years. Without going into particulars,
I would urge that you rethink the situation
regarding F4J in the US.”
At the time Matt didn’t buy it. Though
I’m sure Matt has long since forgotten
about my letter, it appears that over the
past couple years our views on the subject
have converged. Recently O’Connor
sent out the following announcement on behalf
of Fathers 4 Justice:
“Dear friends,
“As you may or may not be aware,
I have recently made efforts to resolve
a dispute with our colleagues in the US.
“In the course of the last six
years of my life I have learnt to value
the ‘f’ word. No, not the
one normally associated with my rich Anglo-Saxon
vocabulary, but the word forgiveness.
“In this time I’ll admit
to making mistakes and letting people
down on occasion. But, regardless of spin
or media stereotyping, I remain true to
what I started.
“In the last few years my family
have been pilloried and I have been on
the receiving end of death threats and
media disembowelment. I have taken some
fairly unpleasant flack from both friends
and foe, but I remain strong, standing
and pushing our movement towards its objectives.“Our
dispute with Jamil Jabr is well known
however some of the recent attacks on
his character are regrettable and only
serve to undermine the credibility of
our US colleagues. We must move on, together,
if we are to succeed. Jamil to his credit
is an enormously compassionate and motivated
individual. Without him there would be
nothing in the US and I truly hope that
we can resolve our differences so we can
move forward in a way that will capture
the spirit and imagination of the United
States.
“To that end we have been working
on a major US campaign that we think will
benefit everybody. It won’t be ‘our’
campaign, but yours. Our aim is not to
run, take over or do anything like that.
Our objective is to empower and aid our
American colleagues with a relationship
based on mutual respect and trust.
“To that end I believe we are moving
towards the day when we will come together,
work together and succeed together.”
|